Tuesday, 18 June 2013

The Two-Spirit Tradition - A Native American Experience



[]

The first step on the path to a two-spirit life was taken during childhood. The Papago ritual is representative of this early integration: If parents noticed that a son was disinterested in boyish play or manly work they would set up a ceremony to determine which way the boy would be brought up. They would make an enclosure of brush, and place in the center both a man’s bow and a woman’s basket. The boy was told to go inside the circle of brush and to bring something out, and as he entered the brush would be set on fire. “They watched what he took with him as he ran out, and if it was the basketry materials they reconciled [sic] themselves to his being a berdache.” [1]

The Mohave ritual, usually carried out when the child is between the ages of nine and twelve, has a different form, but keeps the central element of allowing the child’s nature to manifest itself: A singing circle is prepared, unbeknown to the boy, involving the whole community as well as distant friends and relatives. On the day of the ceremony everyone gathers round and the boy is led into the middle of the circle. If he remains there, the singer, hidden in the crowd, begins to sing the ritual songs and the boy, if he is destined to follow the two-spirit road, starts to dance in the fashion of a woman. “He cannot help it,” say the Mohave. After the fourth song the boy is declared to be a two-spirit person and is raised from then on in the appropriate manner. [2]

What manner was that? It consisted of teaching the young boy to do women’s work as well as that reserved for men. He would also spend time with healers, often two-spirit people themselves. Above all, his childhood was marked by acceptance and understanding. That did not necessarily insulate the boy from being ribbed about his ‘otherness.’ Joseph Quinones, the cousin of a Yaqui two-spirit youth, relates that: “One time we kids got down on him for not being typically masculine, but my Great Aunt, who is the clan matriarch, came down on us real strongly. She said it was part of his character and we should respect him.” [3]




In recent times that pattern of acceptance has been undermined by the boarding school education forced upon native children, by the influence of Christian missionaries, and increasingly by the encroachment of television into the psychic space of the tribe, with the result that two-spirit people are more and more being viewed with suspicion by the less traditionalist in their community. Robert Stoller observes the “… deterioration in American Indians of techniques for ritualizing cross-gender behavior. No longer is a place provided for the role – more, the identity – of a male-woman, the dimensions of which are fixed by customs, rules, trade-offs and responsibilities. The tribes have forgotten. Instead, this role appears as a ghost.” [4]

All tribes were aware of the existence of two-spirit people, and each still has a name for them. The Dinéh (Navaho) refer to them as nàdleehé one who is ‘transformed’, the Lakota (Sioux) as winkte, the Mohave as alyha, the Zuni as lhamana, the Omaha as mexoga, the Aleut and Kodiak as achnucek, the Zapotec as ira’ muxe, the Cheyenne as he man eh. [5]  This abundance of terms testifies to the familiarity of Native Americans with gender-variant people. For proof of the sacred role they held, and hold, in Native society we again turn to Native sources. Terry Calling Eagle, a Lakota man, recounts: “Winktes have to be born that way. People know that a person is going to become a winkte very early in his life. At about age twelve parents will take him to a ceremony to communicate with past winktes who had power, to verify if it is just a phase or a permanent thing for his lifetime. If the proper vision takes place, and communication with a past winkte is established, then everybody accepts him as a winkte. [6]

Claire R. Farrer, an anthropologist who has “gone native” in the best sense of the term, reports on the present situation among the Mescalero Apache: “Multigendered adult people at Mescalero are usually presumed to be people of power. Because they have both maleness and femaleness totally entwined in one body, they are known to be able to ‘see’ with the eyes of both proper men and proper women. They are often called upon to be healers, or mediators, or interpreters of dreams, or expected to become singers or others whose lives are devoted to the welfare of the group. If they do extraordinary things in any aspect of life, it is assumed that they have the license and power to do so and, therefore, they are not questioned. [7]

In everyday life the two-spirit male typically would wear women’s clothes and do women’s work. He would be accepted as “one of the girls.” He might take a husband from among the men of the tribe, or might have affairs with several, or both. Generally two-spirit males were not expected to have sexual relations with women. None of these “rules” however were iron-bound. [8]  Again and again we see that variation from the norm, change, transformation, and fluidity of roles for those who felt called to that path was welcomed and appreciated. Here we have to confront a very real epistemological problem: it is impossible to define precisely what two-spirit experience is. Though all agree such individuals exist, “the particulars of that identity remain variable.” [9]  We may have to content ourselves with the explanation offered by P.K., one of Carolyn Epple’s Dinéh teachers, who said that we need to “… see nàdleehé as human beings responding to situations.” [10]

Besides their spiritual abilities, their capacity for work also figured into the high status of two-spirit people. Even though a two-spirit male would have taken on the gender identity of a woman, he would still have the endurance and strength of a man. Thus his productivity was greater than that of most women, and for that reason also he would have been valued as a marriage partner. Other characteristics that Natives associate with two-spirit people and that help explain their desirability as partners are a highly developed ability to relate to and teach children, a generous nature, and exceptional intellectual and artistic skills.

[]


[1]        Ruth Underhill, 1938 Social Organization of the Papago Indians, New York, Columbia University Press.
[2]        George Devereux, 1937 “Institutionalized Homosexuality of the Mohave Indians” in Human Biology 9, pp. 508-509.
[3]        Walter L. Williams, 1986 The Spirit and the Flesh, Beacon Press.
[4]        Robert Stoller, 1985. “Two Feminized Male American Indians” in Presentations of Gender, pp. 171-180, New Haven, Yale University Press.
[5]        Williams, pp. 51-52.
[6]        Idem, pp. 53-54.
[7]        Claire R. Farrer, 1997 “A Mescalero Apache Singer of Ceremonies” in Two-Spirit People, Chicago, U. of Illinois.
[8]        Ibid., p. 243.
[9]        Carolyn Epple, 1997 “A Navaho Worldview and Nàdleehé” in Two-Spirit People, Chicago, U. of Illinois.
[10]        Ibid., p. 184.


Source [and Full Text]: Andrew Calimach, The Two-Spirit Tradition, 2000.

Saturday, 18 May 2013

Quoting Zoe Leonard

"Why is it that the work of minority artists is always examined for signs of difference? Why is it always us--the dykes and fags, the women artists, the black poets, the Asian playwrights--who are asked about our sexuality or our race? What does being a white man have to do with Robert Ryman's work or Jeff Koons's? What does being heterosexual have to do with Picasso's? I don't mind being a woman artist. And as a lesbian I'm as out as can be. But it's the double standard that bugs me."

Source: Lesbian Art in America: A Contemporary History by Harmony Hammond. | Quote by Zoe Leonard

Thursday, 16 May 2013

AIC Launches First-of-Its-Kind Lawsuit, Sues for Irreparable Harm Resulting from Surgery


On May 14th, 2013, Advocates for Informed Choice, The Southern Poverty Law Center, and pro bono counsel for the private law firms of Janet, Jenner & Suggs and Steptoe & Johnson LLP filed a lawsuit today against South Carolina Department of Social Services (SCDSS), Greenville Hospital System, Medical University of South Carolina and individual employees for performing an irreversible and medically unnecessary surgery on an infant who was in the state’s care at the time of the surgery.
The lawsuit, filed in both state and federal court, charges that it was a violation of the U.S. Constitution when South Carolina doctors working for the state surgically removed the healthy genital tissue of a 16-month-old child, potentially sterilizing him and greatly reducing, if not eliminating, his sexual function.

M.C. was born with an intersex condition – a reproductive or sexual anatomy that does not fit typical definitions of male or female. Doctors referred to M.C. as a “true hermaphrodite.” The child was in the care of the South Carolina Department of Social Services when doctors, in cooperation with social services employees, decided to perform this medically unnecessary surgery. Children with M.C.’s intersex condition have bodies that are not easily labeled as either male or female.
Typically, children with these conditions develop as a boy or girl as they grow. Despite not knowing whether M.C. would grow up to be a man or woman, or whether he would elect to have any surgery at all, the defendants performed sex-assignment surgery on a 16-month-old child, removing his healthy phallus in an attempt to make M.C. a girl. M.C. has shown signs of developing a male gender and now, at age 8, has clearly identified himself as a boy.

The lawsuit is the first of its kind in the United States. Since the 1950s, doctors have performed this type of non-consensual sex assignment surgery on infants with intersex conditions. Hundreds of affected adults have come forward to challenge these procedures as abusive and unnecessary. To them, each surgery represents a future of pain, shame and damaged or lost sexual function. M.C., then but a baby, is now included among them. We hope that with the historic launching of this lawsuit, he will be the last. Read the full press release.

Source: Anne Tamar-Mattis, Founding Executive Director of Advocates for Informed Choice

Search

Loading...

No Suture! Archive